-
Hepatotoxicity-related hospitalizations among patients treated with opioid/acetaminophen combination pain medications
Duh, MS. Vekeman, F. Korves, C. et al.
Pain Med. 2010 Nov;11(11):1718-25.
OBJECTIVE: This study determined the risk of serious hepatotoxicity resulting in hospitalizations among patients prescribed opioid/acetaminophen combinations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using an insurance claims database was conducted. Adult patients with ≥1 claim for oxycodone/acetaminophen or hydrocodone/acetaminophen combinations were included (N = 1,228,356). A pre-post design was employed to compare serious hepatotoxicity risk before versus after initiation of opioid/acetaminophen combination. Serious hepatotoxicity risk between the opioid/acetaminophen group and a control group of opioid-alone users (N = 11,809) was also examined. Within the opioid/acetaminophen group, risk of hepatotoxicity-related hospitalizations pre- versus post-opioid/acetaminophen treatment was compared using the normal approximation with the binomial distribution. The incidence rate of hepatotoxicity-related hospitalizations for the opioid/acetaminophen group was compared with the opioid-alone group using multivariate Poisson regression adjusting for baseline differences between groups. RESULTS: Of the opioid/acetaminophen cohort, hepatotoxicity-related hospitalization risk in the 6-month post-opioid/acetaminophen period was lower than that in the pre-period with a risk reduction of 1.2 per 10,000 (pre-period = 0.12%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.13; post-period = 0.11%; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.12). In the 12-month period, risk increased in the post-period by 2.4 per 10,000 (pre-period = 0.14%; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.15; post-period = 0.17%; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.18). After adjusting for confounders, the opioid-alone group did not demonstrate a lower rate of hepatotoxicity-related hospitalizations than the opioid/acetaminophen group (incidence rate ratio of opioid-alone over opioid/acetaminophen = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.8 to 4.7). CONCLUSIONS: There is no population data-based evidence supporting elevated risk of hepatotoxicity-related hospitalization associated with opioid/acetaminophen combinations.
OBJECTIVE: This study determined the risk of serious hepatotoxicity resulting in hospitalizations among patients prescribed opioid/acetaminophen combinations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using an insurance claims database was conducted.
-
Opioid Use in Primary Care: Asking the Right Questions.
Lewis, ET. Trafton, JA.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011 Jan 12.
Pain is one of the most common reasons that patients seek treatment from health care professionals, often their primary care providers. One tool for treating pain is opioid therapy, and opioid prescriptions have increased dramatically in recent years in the United States. This article will review recent research about opioids that is most relevant to treating chronic pain in the context of a typical primary care practice. It will focus on four key practices that providers can engage in before and during the course of opioid therapy that we believe will enhance the likelihood that opioids, when used, are an effective tool for pain management: avoiding sole reliance on opioids; using adequate opioid doses to address pain; mitigating the risk of opioid misuse by patients; and fostering collaborative relationships for treating complex patients.
Pain is one of the most common reasons that patients seek treatment from health care professionals, often their primary care providers. One tool for treating pain is opioid therapy, and opioid prescriptions have increased dramatically in recent...
-
Low back pain: an approach to diagnosis and management.
Duffy, RL.
Prim Care. 2010 Dec;37(4):729-41, vi.
Low back pain is a common condition, responsible for significant morbidity and major occupational and economic impact on society. While most cases of low back pain spontaneously resolve, the clinician must be alert to clinical indicators or "red flags" that suggest the presence of systemic illness or imminent neurologic compromise. In the absence of such findings, diagnostic imaging generally does not contribute to management, and may be safely delayed for a trial of conservative therapy. Continued activity is associated with a favorable outcome. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, acetaminophen, muscle relaxants, and tricyclic antidepressants can provide meaningful pain relief, while several nonpharmacologic measures may also contribute to symptomatic and functional improvement.
Low back pain is a common condition, responsible for significant morbidity and major occupational and economic impact on society. While most cases of low back pain spontaneously resolve, the clinician must be alert to clinical indicators or...
-
Chronic low back pain, sleep disturbance, and interleukin-6.
Heffner KL, France CR, Trost Z. et al.
Clin J Pain. 2011 Jan;27(1):35-41.
OBJECTIVES: Sleep disturbance is a common comorbidity of chronic pain. Inflammatory processes are dysregulated in sleep disturbance and also contribute to pain sensitivity. Thus, inflammation may play an important role in bidirectional associations between pain and sleep. Little is known about concurrent relationships among chronic pain, sleep, and inflammation. The aim of our study was to examine associations between sleep disturbance and circulating levels of the inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-6 (IL-6), in individuals with and without chronic low back pain. METHODS: Sex-matched and age-matched adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP; n=25) or without chronic pain (controls; n=25)completed measures of sleep quality in the past month and depressive symptoms in the past week, and provided a blood sample for IL-6. The next morning, participants reported their sleep quality the previous night and their current experience of morning pain. RESULTS: Individuals with CLBP had more sleep disturbance than controls. Circulating IL-6 levels were similar for the 2 groups; however, in adults with CLBP, poorer sleep quality was associated with higher IL-6 levels, and both sleep and IL-6 related to pain reports. Unlike CLBP participants, controls showed normal, age-related increases in IL-6 levels, whereas sleep quality was unrelated to IL-6 levels. Depressive symptoms could not fully explain the observed associations. DISCUSSION: Inflammatory processes may play a significant role in the cycles of pain and sleep disturbance. Clinical interventions that improve sleep and reduce concomitant inflammatory dysregulation hold promise for chronic pain management.
OBJECTIVES: Sleep disturbance is a common comorbidity of chronic pain. Inflammatory processes are dysregulated in sleep disturbance and also contribute to pain sensitivity. Thus, inflammation may play an important role in bidirectional...
-
Prevalence, correlates, and treatment outcomes for chronic non-cancer pain in patients with comorbid substance use disorder
Morasco, BJ. Gritzner, S. Lewis, L. et al.
Pain. 2010 Dec 22.
Recent data suggest that comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs) are common among chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) patients; however, prevalence rates vary across studies and findings are limited regarding treatment options for CNCP patients with comorbid SUD. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the prevalence, associated demographic and clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes for CNCP patients with comorbid SUD. We conducted searches from Ovid MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PubMED from 1950 through February 2010 and retrieved the references. Thirty-eight studies met inclusion criteria and provided data that addressed our key questions. Three to forty-eight percent of CNCP patients have a current SUD. There are no demographic or clinical factors that consistently differentiate CNCP patients with comorbid SUD from patients without SUD, though SUD patients appear to be at greater risk for aberrant medication-related behaviors. CNCP patients with SUD are more likely to be prescribed opioid medications and at higher doses than CNCP patients without a history of SUD. CNCP patients with comorbid SUD do not significantly differ in their responses to treatment compared to CNCP patients without SUD, though the quality of this evidence is low. Limited data are available to identify predictors of treatment outcome. Although clinical experience and research suggests that SUDs are common among CNCP patients, only limited data are available to guide clinicians who treat this population. Research is needed to increase understanding of the prevalence, correlates, and responses to treatment of CNCP patients with comorbid SUDs.
Recent data suggest that comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs) are common among chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) patients; however, prevalence rates vary across studies and findings are limited regarding treatment options for CNCP patients with...
-
Preclinic group education sessions reduce waiting times and costs at public pain medicine units.
Davies, S. Quintner, J. Parsons, R. et al.
Pain Med. 2011 Jan;12(1):59-71.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of preclinic group education sessions and system redesign on tertiary pain medicine units and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two public hospital multidisciplinary pain medicine units. PATIENTS: People with persistent pain. INTERVENTIONS: A system redesign from a "traditional" model (initial individual medical appointments) to a model that delivers group education sessions prior to individual appointments. Based on Patient Triage Questionnaires patients were scheduled to attend Self-Training Educative Pain Sessions (STEPS), a two day eight hour group education program, followed by optional patient-initiated clinic appointments. OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of patients completing STEPS who subsequently requested individual outpatient clinic appointment(s); wait-times; unit cost per new patient referred; recurrent health care utilization; patient satisfaction; Global Perceived Impression of Change (GPIC); and utilized pain management strategies. RESULTS: Following STEPS 48% of attendees requested individual outpatient appointments. Wait times reduced from 105.6 to 16.1 weeks at one pain unit and 37.3 to 15.2 weeks at the second. Unit cost per new patient appointed reduced from $1,805 Australian Dollars (AUD) to AUD$541 (for STEPS). At 3 months, patients scored their satisfaction with "the treatment received for their pain" more positively than at baseline (change score=0.88; P=0.0003), GPIC improved (change score=0.46; P<0.0001) and mean number of active strategies utilized increased by 4.12 per patient (P=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of STEPS was associated with reduced wait-times and costs at public pain medicine units and increased both the use of active pain management strategies and patient satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of preclinic group education sessions and system redesign on tertiary pain medicine units and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Two public hospital multidisciplinary pain medicine units.
-
Managing low back pain in the primary care setting: the know-do gap.
Scott, NA. Moga, C. Harstall, C.
Pain Res Manag. 2010 Nov-Dec;15(6):392-400.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain knowledge gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic low back pain (LBP) in the primary care setting to prepare a scoping survey for identifying knowledge gaps in LBP management among Alberta's primary care practitioners, and to identify potential barriers to implementing a multidisciplinary LBP guideline. METHODS: English language studies, published from 1996 to 2008, comparing the clinical practice patterns of primary care practitioners with guideline recommendations were identified by systematically searching literature databases, the websites of various health technology assessment agencies and libraries, and the Internet. Data were synthesized qualitatively. RESULTS: The literature search identified 14 relevant studies. Knowledge gaps were reported among various primary care practitioner groups in the assessment of red flags, use of diagnostic imaging, provision of advice regarding sick leave and continuing activity, administration of some medications (muscle relaxants, oral steroids and opioids) and recommendation of particular treatments (acupuncture, physiotherapy, spinal manipulation, traction, ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and spinal mobilization). CONCLUSIONS: A know-do gap clearly exists among primary care practitioners with respect to the diagnosis and treatment of LBP. The information on know-do gaps will be used to construct a survey tool for unearthing the local knowledge gaps extant among Alberta's primary care practitioners, and to develop a dissemination strategy for a locally produced multidisciplinary LBP guideline, with the aim of ensuring that the know-do gaps inherent within each primary practice discipline are specifically targeted.
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain knowledge gaps in the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic low back pain (LBP) in the primary care setting to prepare a scoping survey for identifying knowledge gaps in LBP management among Alberta's primary care...
-
Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Cluster Headache.
Kano, H. Kondziolka, D. Niranjan, A. et al.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2010 Dec 23.
Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has proven to be an effective management approach for trigeminal neuralgia and as a minimally invasive alternative management option for cluster headache (CH). In CH, patients undergo single-session focused irradiation of the trigeminal nerve root (TN), sometimes coupled with irradiation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) as well. SRS provides early pain relief in most patients, but is associated with trigeminal sensory dysfunction in some patients. In the future, a prospective trial that compares a single target of TN to dual targets of both the TN and SPG may provide further understanding of the value of SRS for CH.
Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has proven to be an effective management approach for trigeminal neuralgia and as a minimally invasive alternative management option for cluster headache (CH). In CH, patients undergo single-session...
-
Do 0-10 numeric rating scores translate into clinically meaningful pain measures for children?
Voepel-Lewis, T. Burke, CN. Jeffreys, N. et al.
Anesth Analg. 2011 Feb;112(2):415-21.
BACKGROUND: Self-reported pain scores are used widely in clinical and research settings, yet little is known about their interpretability in children. In this prospective, observational study we evaluated the relationship between 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores and other self-reported, clinically meaningful outcomes, including perceived need for medicine (PNM), pain relief (PR), and perceived satisfaction (PS) with treatment in children postoperatively. METHODS: This study included children ages 7 to 16 years undergoing surgery associated with postoperative pain. One to 4 observations were recorded in each child within the first 24 hours postoperatively. At each assessment, children rated their pain with the NRS, stated their PNM, and rated their satisfaction with pain management. Assessments were repeated within 1 to 2 hours, and children additionally rated their PR as the same, better, or worse in comparison with the earlier assessment. Receiver operator characteristic curves were developed to examine potential NRS cut-points for PNM and PS, and the minimum clinically significant difference (MCSD) in pain score associated with PR was calculated. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-seven observations (including 189 pairs) were recorded in 113 children. NRS scores associated with PNM were significantly higher than "no need" (median 6 vs. 3; P < 0.001). NRS scores >4 had good sensitivity (0.81) and specificity (0.70) to discriminate PNM, but with a large number of false positives and negatives (e.g., 42% of children with scores >4 did not need analgesia). The MCSD in NRS scores was -1 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.5 to 1) or +1 (CI 0.5 to 2.7) in relation to feel "a little better" or "worse," respectively (P < 0.001 vs. the same). NRS scores >6 had a sensitivity of 0.82 and specificity of 0.76 in discriminating dissatisfaction with treatment, yet 46% and 24% of children with scores >6, respectively, were somewhat to very satisfied with their analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important information regarding the clinical interpretation of NRS pain scores in children. Data further support the NRS as a valid measure of pain intensity in relation to the child's PNM, PR, and PS in the acute postoperative setting. However, the variability in scores in relation to other clinically meaningful outcomes suggests that application of cut-points for individual treatment decisions is inappropriate.
BACKGROUND: Self-reported pain scores are used widely in clinical and research settings, yet little is known about their interpretability in children. In this prospective, observational study we evaluated the relationship between 0 to 10 numerical...
-
Management Patterns in Acute Low Back Pain: The Role of Physical Therapy.
Gellhorn, AC. Chan, L. Martin, B. Friedly, J.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 19.
STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the relationship between early physical therapy (PT) for acute low back pain and subsequent use of lumbosacral injections, lumbar surgery, and frequent physician office visits for low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Wide practice variations exist in the treatment of acute low back pain. PT has been advocated as an effective treatment in this setting though disagreement exists regarding its purported benefits. METHODS.: A national 20% sample of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician outpatient billing claims was analyzed. Patients were selected who received treatment for low back pain between 2003 and 2004 (n = 439,195). To exclude chronic low back conditions, patients were excluded if they had a prior visit for back pain, lumbosacral injection, or lumbar surgery within the previous year. Main outcome measures were rates of lumbar surgery, lumbosacral injections, and frequent physician office visits for low back pain over the following year. RESULTS.: Based on logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio for undergoing surgery in the group of enrollees that received PT in the acute phase (<4 weeks) compared to those receiving PT in the chronic phase (>3 months) was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36-0.41), adjusting for age, gender, diagnosis, treating physician specialty, and comorbidity. The adjusted odds ratio for receiving a lumbosacral injection in the group receiving PT in the acute phase was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.44-0.49), and the adjusted odds ratio for frequent physician office usage in the group receiving PT in the acute phase was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.44-0.50). CONCLUSIONS.: There was a lower risk of subsequent medical service usage among patients who received PT early after an episode of acute low back pain relative to those who received PT at later times. Medical specialty variations exist regarding early use of PT, with potential underutilization among generalist specialties.
STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE.: To evaluate the relationship between early physical therapy (PT) for acute low back pain and subsequent use of lumbosacral injections, lumbar surgery, and frequent physician office visits for...
