-
Best evidence of psychosocially focused nonpharmacologic therapies for symptom management in older adults with osteoarthritis.
Shin, SY. Kolanowski, AM.
Pain Manag Nurs. 2010 Dec;11(4):234-44.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic joint problem among older adults which causes severe pain and loss of physical function. Early diagnosis and proper management are important strategies in delaying disease exacerbation and maintaining physical mobility. The number of older adults suffering from joint diseases is increasing, and many of these individuals are using nonpharmacologic therapies (NPTs) to control pain. Because there is no cure for OA, interventions have aimed at controlling pain, improving joint function, and minimizing disability. This paper reviewed literature that examines the effects of psychosocially focused NPTs, including education, self-management, coping skills, and social support for pain control and function improvement in older adults with OA. This review demonstrates that NPTs do not have the side effects that pharmacologic therapies do, but more high-quality clinical trials with appropriate design and meta-analyses need to be conducted to more clearly identify the effects of such NPTs to control pain and improve physical function in older adults with OA. Because many NPTs are easy to learn and use without serious side effects, nurses can play a pivotal role in helping patients implement NPTs for maximal benefit.
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic joint problem among older adults which causes severe pain and loss of physical function. Early diagnosis and proper management are important strategies in delaying disease exacerbation and maintaining...
-
Symptomatic treatment of migraine: when to use NSAIDs, triptans, or opiates.
Taylor, FR. Kaniecki, RG.
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2011 Feb;13(1):15-27.
OPINION STATEMENT: Migraine is a biologic disorder of the brain characterized by a heterogeneous array of symptoms and episodes of disabling headache. By definition, such attacks last between 4 and 72 h without treatment, with the disability arising from a variety of factors including severe pain, gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea or vomiting, and sensory sensitivities to light, noise, or odor. All these features may be exacerbated by stimulation, motion, or activity, often rendering the patient completely immobile. Although retreat and rest, coupled with local application of ice, may provide some measure of comfort, most of those with migraine hunt for therapeutic solutions. In designing acute headache treatment strategies, it is imperative for clinicians to recognize the variability between individuals in the frequency, intensity, and duration of attacks. Certain patients require more aggressive options. It is also crucial to identify the significant intra-individual variability of migraine; most patients describe an assortment of headaches of different intensities and time to disability. Less intense episodes, which patients often term sinus, tension, or regular headaches, usually represent milder versions of migraine, simplifying both diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Evidence-based guidelines and clinical experience support the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the management of mild to moderate migraine attacks. Recommend migraine-specific agents (triptans and dihydroergotamine) when the attacks are more severe or have consistently failed to respond to the use of NSAIDs in the past. Encourage those with less frequent episodic migraine to use their acute agents at the earliest signs of headache. Advise those with frequent headache (>10 days per month) to limit acute treatments to only the most disabling episodes in order to avoid the "medication overuse" phenomenon. Consider rescue or back-up therapy. Do not use compounds containing butalbital or opiates (or place extreme limits on them), out of concern for progression to chronic migraine.
OPINION STATEMENT: Migraine is a biologic disorder of the brain characterized by a heterogeneous array of symptoms and episodes of disabling headache. By definition, such attacks last between 4 and 72 h without treatment, with the disability...
-
Viewing pictures of a romantic partner reduces experimental pain: involvement of neural reward systems.
Younger J, Aron A, Parke S, et al.
PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13309.
The early stages of a new romantic relationship are characterized by intense feelings of euphoria, well-being, and preoccupation with the romantic partner. Neuroimaging research has linked those feelings to activation of reward systems in the human brain. The results of those studies may be relevant to pain management in humans, as basic animal research has shown that pharmacologic activation of reward systems can substantially reduce pain. Indeed, viewing pictures of a romantic partner was recently demonstrated to reduce experimental thermal pain. We hypothesized that pain relief evoked by viewing pictures of a romantic partner would be associated with neural activations in reward-processing centers. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we examined fifteen individuals in the first nine months of a new, romantic relationship. Participants completed three tasks under periods of moderate and high thermal pain: 1) viewing pictures of their romantic partner, 2) viewing pictures of an equally attractive and familiar acquaintance, and 3) a word-association distraction task previously demonstrated to reduce pain. The partner and distraction tasks both significantly reduced self-reported pain, although only the partner task was associated with activation of reward systems. Greater analgesia while viewing pictures of a romantic partner was associated with increased activity in several reward-processing regions, including the caudate head, nucleus accumbens, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex--regions not associated with distraction-induced analgesia. The results suggest that the activation of neural reward systems via non-pharmacologic means can reduce the experience of pain.
Younger J, Aron A, Parke S, et al.
PLoS One. 2010;5(10):e13309.
The early stages of a new romantic relationship are characterized by intense feelings of euphoria, well-being, and preoccupation with the romantic partner. Neuroimaging research has linked those feelings to activation of reward systems in the human brain. The results of those studies may be relevant to pain management in humans, as basic animal research has shown that pharmacologic activation of reward systems can substantially reduce pain. Indeed, viewing pictures of a romantic partner was recently demonstrated to reduce experimental thermal pain. We hypothesized that pain relief evoked by viewing pictures of a romantic partner would be associated with neural activations in reward-processing centers. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we examined fifteen individuals in the first nine months of a new, romantic relationship. -
Risks for opioid abuse and dependence among recipients of chronic opioid therapy: results from the TROUP study.
Edlund MJ, Martin BC, Fan MY, et al.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;112(1-2):90-8.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for opioid abuse/dependence in long-term users of opioids for chronic pain, including risk factors for opioid abuse/dependence that can potentially be modified to decrease the likelihood of opioid abuse/dependence, and non-modifiable risk factors for opioid abuse/dependence that may be useful for risk stratification when considering prescribing opioids. METHODS: We used claims data from two disparate populations, one national, commercially insured population (HealthCore) and one state-based, publicly insured (Arkansas Medicaid). Among users of chronic opioid therapy, we regressed claims-based diagnoses of opioid abuse/dependence on patient characteristics, including physical health, mental health and substance abuse diagnoses, sociodemographic factors, and pharmacological risk factors. RESULTS: Among users of chronic opioid therapy, 3% of both the HealthCore and Arkansas Medicaid samples had a claims-based opioid abuse/dependence diagnosis. There was a strong inverse relationship between age and a diagnosis of opioid abuse/dependence. Mental health and substance use disorders were associated with an increased risk of opioid abuse/dependence. Effects of substance use disorders were especially strong, although mental health disorders were more common. Concerning opioid exposure; lower days supply, lower average doses, and use of Schedule III-IV opioids only, were all associated with lower likelihood of a diagnosis of opioid abuse/dependence. CONCLUSION: Opioid abuse and dependence are diagnosed in a small minority of patients receiving chronic opioid therapy, but this may under-estimate actual misuse. Characteristics of the patients and of the opioid therapy itself are associated with the risk of abuse and dependence.
Edlund MJ, Martin BC, Fan MY, et al.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;112(1-2):90-8.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of and risk factors for opioid abuse/dependence in long-term users of opioids for chronic pain, including risk factors for opioid abuse/dependence that can potentially be modified to decrease the likelihood of opioid abuse/dependence, and non-modifiable risk factors for opioid abuse/dependence that may be useful for risk stratification when considering prescribing opioids. METHODS: We used claims data from two disparate populations, one national, commercially insured population (HealthCore) and one state-based, publicly insured (Arkansas Medicaid). Among users of chronic opioid therapy, we regressed claims-based diagnoses of opioid abuse/dependence on patient characteristics, including physical health, mental health and substance abuse diagnoses, sociodemographic factors, and pharmacological risk factors. -
An update on the pathophysiology of complex regional pain syndrome.
Bruehl S.
Anesthesiology. 2010;113(3):713-25.
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a neuropathic pain disorder with significant autonomic features. Few treatments have proven effective, in part, because of a historically poor understanding of the mechanisms underlying the disorder. CRPS research largely conducted during the past decade has substantially increased knowledge regarding its pathophysiologic mechanisms, indicating that they are multifactorial. Both peripheral and central nervous system mechanisms are involved. These include peripheral and central sensitization, inflammation, altered sympathetic and catecholaminergic function, altered somatosensory representation in the brain, genetic factors, and psychophysiologic interactions. Relative contributions of the mechanisms underlying CRPS may differ across patients and even within a patient over time, particularly in the transition from "warm CRPS" (acute) to "cold CRPS" (chronic). Enhanced knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of CRPS increases the possibility of eventually achieving the goal of mechanism-based CRPS diagnosis and treatment.
Bruehl S.
Anesthesiology. 2010;113(3):713-25.
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a neuropathic pain disorder with significant autonomic features. Few treatments have proven effective, in part, because of a historically poor understanding of the mechanisms underlying the disorder. CRPS research largely conducted during the past decade has substantially increased knowledge regarding its pathophysiologic mechanisms, indicating that they are multifactorial. Both peripheral and central nervous system mechanisms are involved. These include peripheral and central sensitization, inflammation, altered sympathetic and catecholaminergic function, altered somatosensory representation in the brain, genetic factors, and psychophysiologic interactions. -
e-Health and chronic pain management: current status and developments.
Keogh E, Rosser BA, Eccleston C.
Pain. 2010;151(1):18-21.
Keogh E, Rosser BA, Eccleston C.
Pain. 2010;151(1):18-21.
-
Integrative medicine approach to chronic pain
Teets RY, Dahmer S, Scott E.
Prim Care. 2010;37(2):407-21.
Chronic pain can be a frustrating condition for patient and clinician. The integrative medicine approach to pain can offer hope, adding safe complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies to mitigate pain and suffering. Such CAM therapies include nutrition, supplements and herbs, manual medicine, acupuncture, yoga, and mind-body approaches. The evidence is heterogeneous regarding these approaches, but some evidence suggests efficacy and confirms safety. The integrative medicine approach can be beneficial in a patient with chronic pain. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Teets RY, Dahmer S, Scott E.
Prim Care. 2010;37(2):407-21.
Chronic pain can be a frustrating condition for patient and clinician. The integrative medicine approach to pain can offer hope, adding safe complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies to mitigate pain and suffering. Such CAM therapies include nutrition, supplements and herbs, manual medicine, acupuncture, yoga, and mind-body approaches. The evidence is heterogeneous regarding these approaches, but some evidence suggests efficacy and confirms safety. The integrative medicine approach can be beneficial in a patient with chronic pain. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. -
Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines.
Dagenais S, Tricco AC, Haldeman S.
Spine J. 2010;10(6):514-29.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent, costly, and challenging condition to manage. Clinicians must choose among numerous assessment and management options. Several recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on LBP have attempted to inform these decisions by evaluating and summarizing the best available supporting evidence. The quality and consistency of recommendations from these CPGs are currently unknown. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review of recent CPGs and synthesize their recommendations on assessing and managing LBP for clinicians. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Systematic review. METHODS: Literature search using MEDLINE, National Guidelines Clearinghouse, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Internet search engines, and references of known articles. Only CPGs related to both assessment and management of LBP written in English were eligible; CPGs that summarized evidence from before the year 2000 were excluded. Data related to methods and recommendations for assessment and management of LBP were abstracted independently by two reviewers. Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument by two reviewers. RESULTS: The search uncovered 669 citations, of which 95 were potentially relevant and 10 were included in the review; 6 discussed acute LBP, 6 chronic LBP, and 6 LBP with neurologic involvement. Methods used to develop CPGs varied, but the overall methodological quality was high as defined by AGREE scores. Recommendations for assessment of LBP emphasized the importance of ruling out potentially serious spinal pathology, specific causes of LBP, and neurologic involvement, as well as identifying risk factors for chronicity and measuring the severity of symptoms and functional limitations, through the history, physical, and neurologic examination. Recommendations for management of acute LBP emphasized patient education, with short-term use of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or spinal manipulation therapy. For chronic LBP, the addition of back exercises, behavioral therapy, and short-term opioid analgesics was suggested. Management of LBP with neurologic involvement was similar, with additional consideration given to magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography to identify appropriate candidates willing to undergo epidural steroid injections or decompression surgery if more conservative approaches are not successful. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations from several recent CPGs regarding the assessment and management of LBP were similar. Clinicians who care for patients with LBP should endeavor to adopt these recommendations to improve patient care. Future CPGs may wish to invite coauthors from targeted clinician user groups, increase patient participation, update their literature searches before publication, conduct their own quality assessment of studies, and consider cost-effectiveness and other aspects in their recommendations more explicitly. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Dagenais S, Tricco AC, Haldeman S.
Spine J. 2010;10(6):514-29.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent, costly, and challenging condition to manage. Clinicians must choose among numerous assessment and management options. Several recent clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on LBP have attempted to inform these decisions by evaluating and summarizing the best available supporting evidence. The quality and consistency of recommendations from these CPGs are currently unknown. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review of recent CPGs and synthesize their recommendations on assessing and managing LBP for clinicians. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Systematic review. METHODS: Literature search using MEDLINE, National Guidelines Clearinghouse, National Institute for Clinical Excellence, Internet search engines, and references of known articles. -
Management of headache in the elderly.
Robbins MS, Lipton RB.
Drugs Aging. 2010 May;27(5):377-98.
The diagnosis and management of headache disorders in the elderly are challenging. The evaluation of the elderly patient with new-onset or recurrent headache requires a grasp of the heterogeneous set of causes of secondary head pain disorders. Once such aetiologies are excluded, the correct primary headache disorder must be diagnosed. Although tension-type headache is the leading cause of new-onset headache in the elderly, other primary headache disorders such as migraine can manifest in later life, and one disorder, hypnic headache, occurs almost exclusively in the elderly. Primary chronic daily headache persists in elderly patients to a greater extent than the primary episodic headache disorders do. The treatment of elderly patients with primary headache disorders is multifaceted, including acute, prophylactic and at times transitional treatments. Knowledge of drug interactions is particularly important as polypharmacy is the rule. Concomitant illnesses may require adjustments in choice or dose of drugs. In addition, as many acute and preventive treatments are either contraindicated or poorly tolerated in the elderly, modifiable risk factors for headache progression and perpetuation must be addressed. In spite of these treatment complexities, there are numerous opportunities to bring relief to older patients with primary headache disorders from the currently available therapies. New treatment options for elderly patients with headache will soon be available, including acute, prophylactic and interventional techniques.
Robbins MS, Lipton RB.
Drugs Aging. 2010 May;27(5):377-98.
The diagnosis and management of headache disorders in the elderly are challenging. The evaluation of the elderly patient with new-onset or recurrent headache requires a grasp of the heterogeneous set of causes of secondary head pain disorders. Once such aetiologies are excluded, the correct primary headache disorder must be diagnosed. Although tension-type headache is the leading cause of new-onset headache in the elderly, other primary headache disorders such as migraine can manifest in later life, and one disorder, hypnic headache, occurs almost exclusively in the elderly. Primary chronic daily headache persists in elderly patients to a greater extent than the primary episodic headache disorders do. The treatment of elderly patients with primary headache disorders is multifaceted, including acute, prophylactic and at times transitional treatments. -
EFNS Guidelines on the Pharmacological Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: 2009 Revision.
Attal N, Cruccu G, Baron R, et al.
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Apr 9.
Background and objectives: This second European Federation of Neurological Societies Task Force aimed at updating the existing evidence about the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain since 2005. Methods: Studies were identified using the Cochrane Database and Medline. Trials were classified according to the aetiological condition. All class I and II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed; lower class studies were considered only in conditions that had no top-level studies. Treatments administered using repeated or single administrations were considered, provided they are feasible in an outpatient setting. Results: Most large RCTs included patients with diabetic polyneuropathies and post-herpetic neuralgia, while an increasing number of smaller studies explored other conditions. Drugs generally have similar efficacy in various conditions, except in trigeminal neuralgia, chronic radiculopathy and HIV neuropathy, with level A evidence in support of tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), pregabalin, gabapentin, tramadol and opioids (in various conditions), duloxetine, venlafaxine, topical lidocaine and capsaicin patches (in restricted conditions). Combination therapy appears useful for TCA-gabapentin and gabapentin-opioids (level A). Conclusions: There are still too few large-scale comparative studies. For future trials, we recommend to assess comorbidities, quality of life, symptoms and signs with standardized tools and attempt to better define responder profiles to specific drug treatments.
Attal N, Cruccu G, Baron R, et al.
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Apr 9.
Background and objectives: This second European Federation of Neurological Societies Task Force aimed at updating the existing evidence about the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain since 2005. Methods: Studies were identified using the Cochrane Database and Medline. Trials were classified according to the aetiological condition. All class I and II randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were assessed; lower class studies were considered only in conditions that had no top-level studies. Treatments administered using repeated or single administrations were considered, provided they are feasible in an outpatient setting. Results: Most large RCTs included patients with diabetic polyneuropathies and post-herpetic neuralgia, while an increasing number of smaller studies explored other conditions.
